生物制药 » 讨论区 » 分析百问 » 【求助】清洗验证残留限度标准计算10ppm

采购询价

点击提交代表您同意 《用户服务协议》 《隐私政策》

 
需要登录并加入本群才可以回复和发新贴

标题:[未解决]【求助】清洗验证残留限度标准计算10ppm

  [未解决]本主题悬赏 可用分 10  
小牛牛[使用道具]
五级
Rank: 5Rank: 5


UID 119218
精华 0
积分 2318
帖子 4235
信誉分 100
可用分 6099
专家分 0
阅读权限 255
注册 2014-1-6
状态 离线
1
 

【求助】清洗验证残留限度标准计算10ppm

请教各位朋友,清洗验证中10pmm法计算最大允许残留量,也就是上批产品的残留量不得超过下批产品产量的百万分之十,这个方法的科学依据是什么,怎么来的?谢谢!
顶部
tomm[使用道具]
五级
Rank: 5Rank: 5


UID 119240
精华 0
积分 2226
帖子 4071
信誉分 100
可用分 5555
专家分 0
阅读权限 255
注册 2014-1-7
状态 离线
2
 
进行一下药学考据。。。

1-最早来源

BIOTECHNOLOGY INSPECTION GUIDE (November 1991)

Part of the answer to the question, "how clean is clean?", is, "how good is your analytical system?".The sensitivity of modern analytical apparatus has lowered some detection thresholds past parts per million, down to parts per billion.

这应该是最早来源。



2-Fourman, G.L., and Mullin, Determining Cleaning Validation

Acceptance Limits for Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Operations, Pharm.

Tech., 17(4), 54-60 (1993) - for standard 10 ppm and 1/1000 lowest

theoretical dose calculations based on compounds that are efficacious.

【分析】在1993年的这篇文章,提出了10ppm的限度和1/1000的计算公式基础。

(No more than 10 ppm of any product will apprear in another product. The idea of using a maximum allowable parts-per-millon level has its roots in the regulations that apply to food products.-这是文章中的句子)



很多人因为PDA论坛的影响,认为这是最早来源。但是1991年是在1993年之前,因此还是1991年的指南为最早来源。但是仔细阅读后,会发现他们含义不同。



3-GUIDE TO INSPECTIONS OF VALIDATION OF CLEANING PROCESSES (July 1993)

V. Establishment of Limits(para 1)

“…Some limits that have been mentioned by industry representatives in the literature or in presentations include analytical detection levels such as 10 PPM, biological activity levels such as 1/1000 of the normal therapeutic dose,

and organoleptic levels such as no visible residue.”

【分析】FDA指南中的10ppm和第二份资料中含义不同。



4-GUIDE TO INSPECTIONS OF BULK PHARMACEUTICAL CHEMICALS (May 1994)

“Specific inspectional coverage for cleaning should include:

3. Analytical Method/Cleaning Limitsart of the answer to the question, "how clean is clean?", is, "how good is your analytical system?". The sensitivity

of modern analytical apparatus has lowered some detection thresholds past parts per million, down to parts per billion.”

【分析】仔细看,第四份资料和第一份资料基本相同。

5-EU GUIDE TO GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE: ANNEX 15 - VALIDATION MASTER PLAN DESIGN

QUALIFICATION, INSTALLATION AND OPERATIONAL QUALIFICATION, NON-STERILE PROCESS VALIDATION, CLEANING VALIDATION - SUPERSEDED! (October 1999)

“Carry-over of product residues should meet defined criteria, for example the most stringent of the following criteria:

no more than 0.1% of the normal therapeutic dose of any product will appear in the maximum daily dose of the following product,

no more than 10 ppm of any product will appear in another product,

no quantity of residue should be visible on the equipment after cleaning procedures are performed. Spiking studies should determine the concentration at which most active ingredients are visible,

for certain allergenic ingredients, penicillins, cephalosporins or potent steroids and cytotoxics, the limit should be below the limit of detection by best available analytical methods. In practice this may mean that dedicated plants

are used for these products.”

【分析】大部分人心中的清洁验证标准终于完全体现出来了!

EU GMP选择含义是根据那篇文献,而不是延续FDA指南的含义。



【综合分析】FDA指南中的10ppm指的是现代分析仪器和分析方法检测限度;其他指南中10ppm指的是产品残留在其他产品中的体现。但是如果简单在验证方案上面写10ppm是不行的,需要论证这个限度。

参见

Selected FDA 483 Observations (May 2000)

Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Manufacture

“There should be a scientific justification for the specification for residuals stated in the cleaning validation (simply stating <10ppm is not enough!)”
顶部
jom[使用道具]
五级
Rank: 5Rank: 5


UID 119251
精华 0
积分 1616
帖子 2891
信誉分 100
可用分 3861
专家分 0
阅读权限 255
注册 2014-1-7
状态 离线
3
 
楼上回复的很好
顶部