X射线多晶体衍射（XRD）

投稿修会，里面审稿人有一句话：
By the Raman study, the authors take as major conclusion that “the analysis above indicates that the sample has perfect crystallinity with a hexagonal wurtzite phase.” This was already concluded by the XRD analyses. What else does it show new? How does it relate to the morphologies observed at different concentrations or with the growth mechanism discussed?

因为不同形貌样品做的拉曼峰位置都一样，好像无法从中解释形貌的变化，那该怎么回到审稿人啊？谢谢

第一个问题，是你XRD与Raman结果的差异，Raman的分析是否有新的发现；
第二个问题，你是否愿意补充实验，不愿意补充似乎要说明你的理由。

还是你自己做考虑该如何回答，毕竟是你本人做的实验

第一个问题，“This was already concluded by the XRD analyses. What else does it show new？”你的结论写法上可能有一些问题，reviewer认为那个结构已经被XRD证明了，Raman的结果没有新意，只是辅证了。你需要写出你的Raman的的意义。
第二个问题，你需要写出你的结论和morphologies observed at different concentrations 或者是 with the growth mechanism discussed的关系